Save (bundle) a running instance to S3

The process of saving a running instance to S3 is called "bundling" in Amazon terminology.

Best Practices

While this method of bundling server images is supported in the Dashboard, our preferred design approach is to create a server template, which is a base AMI image that you can customize by adding RightScripts.  It's a much easier way to manage servers and you also avoid a bundling version nightmare.  But, if you're comfortable with your bundling process you could always get something up and running and then migrate to a server template solution at a later time.

Bundle a Running Instance

If you wish to bundle a running instance in the Dashbaord, click on the Nickname of a running instance.

01-bundling_running_instance.gif

Click on the Bundle button.

02-bundling_bundle.gif

Bundling a running instance will save a copy of your server's image to S3, which you can later use for rebooting a server.  Bundling a server does NOT "hibernate" or "suspend" the image; the instance will remain operational. You are only taking a snapshot of it at that particular time. 

03-bundling_properties.gif

  • Instance - the name of the bundled instance.
  • Nickname - the Dashboard suggests a nickname for the bundled instance using a time stamp, but you can change the name to whatever you want.
  • S3 Bucket - the name of the S3 bucket where the bundled instance will be saved.
  • Kernel - the instance's kernel.
  • Ramdisk - the instance's Ramdisk.
  • Root Volume Size - The default is 10GB. 

 

 

 

Tag page
Viewing 2 of 2 comments: view all
Is there any way to ignore mounted EBS volumes when bundling an instance?
Posted 15:59, 11 Sep 2008
Hi nated,

You raise an interesting question. At the current time, we recommend unmounting an EBS volume before bundling an instance. The mount point should be left intact but, the volume should be "not mounted" before bundling an instance. We realize this is not the most graceful way, but it should work for now. In the maintime, we're working on a better solution for this type of scenario. Thanks for your comment!

-Dean
Posted 22:33, 17 Sep 2008
Viewing 2 of 2 comments: view all
You must login to post a comment.